by: Every Choreographer on Callers Box
formation: improper
| A1 | 8 | neighbors do si do once
|
| 8 | neighbors swing
| |
| A2 | 8 | ladles allemande right 1½
|
| 8 | partners swing
| |
| B1 | 8 | gentlespoons chain to neighbors
|
| 8 | star right 4 places
| |
| B2 | 8 | right left through
|
| 8 | star left 4 places ⁋
|
This dance was (mostly) auto-generated using:
• a dance validator written in .NET9 using Claude Opus 4.6 and Agency Copilot, tested against the full body of work published with figures on Callers Box
• a dance fuzzer written via the same AI tooling to find all dances with less than a 25% difference in published choreography (Lisa Greenleaf's stated requirement for dance originality).
• the same AI model, trained on the full list of dances with figures published on Callers Box and instructed to generate a dance that fits within the common patterns for dance choreography using a fixed set of "glossary" figures, verify that the dance progresses correctly, and that the dance is at least 75% unique.
This dance was not written by Isaac Banner -- it was written by an AI model trained on the complete set of choreography published on Callers Box and therefore authorship/attribution is not applicable in the standard sense. Besides, it doesn't take AI to brute-force combinations of eight transformations on a 2x2 matrix until you find a correct end state.
This dance is not art. This dance is a mathematical equation.
This dance is original. This dance is also not original.
All of you wrote this dance. Congratulations.